Friday, August 26, 2011

Sony Ericsson Xperia™ X10


Of the world's largest phone manufacturers, perhaps none has taken a more twisted road to smartphone ubiquity than Sony Ericsson. It began its journey back in the pre-joint venture Ericsson days by throwing its weight behind Symbian, a smartphone platform that would ultimately become the world's most popular -- but it made a fatal error in supporting the doomed UIQ flavor that never saw even a fraction of the support its S60 cousin did. UIQ's untimely (but predicted) collapse last year left the company nearly rudderless and ill-equipped to deal with competitors like Nokia, HTC, and Apple, all of whom had long since embraced other platforms -- all with fighting chances of market dominance.

Left without a platform to champion, Sony Ericsson would ultimately continue supporting Symbian through its involvement with the Symbian Foundation and phones like the Satio and Vivaz... and it would ramp up support for Windows Mobile with the Xperia X1 and X2... and it would bring Android into the fold with the X10, all within a few months of each other. All told, Sony Ericsson enters 2010 actively supporting three unrelated smartphone platforms, and comments by CEO Bert Norberg at MWC in February lead us to believe that they'd be happy to take on a fourth (or more) if the opportunity presented itself. It's an odd strategy to be sure, particularly for a company that's struggling mightily and shrinking its workforce more than any other top-five manufacturer. How it intends to effectively compete on three different fronts without spreading itself hopelessly thin, well... that remains a huge question mark.

That said, the Xperia X10 is perhaps the most promising of Sony Ericsson's confusing crop of modern smartphones, combining attractive hardware with killer specs, Android, and an intriguing custom skin. Does it hold its own against modern competitors like HTC's Nexus One and Desire? And more importantly, can it keep Sony Ericsson from going over the brink? Read on to find out.

Note: Sony Ericsson contacted us shortly after the review was published to let us know that this particular X10 is running pre-production firmware, which may account for some of the issues we had with keyboard performance and occasional sluggishness. Let's hope!

Hardware
Secondly, with a 4-inch full wide VGA display, the X10 is big, very nearly approaching HD2 territory. That's not a problem for this huge-handed reviewer, but friends with more diminutive statures specifically called out the X10 as being a hassle to hold (fortunately, the upcoming X10 mini should be just what the doctor ordered for those folks, at the cost of screen real estate and processor power). Around back, the X10's battery cover is made of a lovely, high-quality soft touch material that is pretty much exactly what we like to find on the back of every phone we review. It feels nice, and the gentle, sloping curves make sure it's comfortable to hold. The phone clocks in at 13mm thick, not the thinnest on the market (the HD2 is an astounding 11mm, for example) but thin enough to look and feel... well, pretty thin. No one's going to accuse this of being a portly device, rest assured.

Around the sides, you find all the buttons and connectors you expect, including power and both micro-USB and 3.5mm headphone jacks at the top, volume and two-stage camera controls on the right, and the typical menu, home, and back buttons below the screen up front. The micro-USB port is covered with a flap, which improves the aesthetic appearance of the upper edge of the device but probably serves little practical function (we've seen micro-USB ports behave just fine with some pretty extreme lint packed in there), makes the daily task of charging more of a chore than it needs to be, and risks being broken off with repetitive use. There's no indication of a dock connector anywhere on the phone, so unless there's some inductive capability that Sony Ericsson has yet to discuss, that port will be the one and only way of juicing your phone day in and day out.

Notably absent is a dedicated search button, which might leave some existing Android owners upgrading to the X10 feeling like a fish out of water -- it's not that there aren't other ways to access search bars throughout the phone, naturally, but we could definitely understand missing one-press access to them. Adding to the potential for confusion is a silkscreened magnifying glass icon below the volume rocker, which makes it look like you might be able to press and hold the volume down button to get a search bar, but no -- it's actually indicating that the rocker doubles as a zoom control (which, admittedly, is a perfectly valid alternative use of the magnifying glass).

Software
The X10 isn't just an Android phone -- it's also the first to introduce Sony Ericsson's rather comprehensive Android skin, a package we'd first heard of in the middle of last year under the codename "Rachael." Unfortunately, it's taken the company so long to get Rachael good enough to launch that we're now two releases of the Android core beyond where the X10 stands; this phone comes with 1.6 out of the box, while devices like the Nexus One, Droid / Milestone, and Legend are putting along on 2.1, and we've no doubt that the next big version is just around the corner. Sony Ericsson has wisely committed to updating the phone on an ongoing basis, but it speaks to the same problem with which HTC and Motorola are already well-acquainted: when Google's iterating on its mobile platform at this breakneck pace, it's virtually impossible for the heavily-customized skins like Blur and Sense to keep pace.

That said, Android 1.6 (née Donut) is still a perfectly serviceable version of the platform, and Sony Ericsson has injected a few key modifications that make some of the benefits of 2.0 / 2.1 moot. The meat of these tweaks revolves around two applications, Timescape and Mediascape. Timescape starts by going down the same social aggregation path that Motorola has with Happenings and HTC with Friend Stream -- basically, a chronological timeline of your friends' status updates across Twitter, Facebook, and MySpace -- but keeps going by offering other timelines for other services within the phone (photos, SMS and MMS messages, emails, and so on). These timelines are presented in ultra-trippy 3D stacks that Sony Ericsson has coined "Splines," and once status updates have been properly loaded into memory, these so-called Splines perform pretty well -- they're slick and smooth as you flick them up and down with your finger. There's some pretty nasty initial jerkiness, though, if you haven't viewed Timescape in a while.

Speaking of jerkiness, the X10 suffers from the same issue that plagues the Nexus One: despite the blazingly fast 1GHz Snapdragon core that's aboard, portions of the interface feel barely quicker than a lowly 528MHz MSM7201A. Since we've seen similar issues on the Nexus One, we can't really chalk up the problems to Sony Ericsson's customizations, so we're not sure how or where to place the blame -- it's just inconsistent, even without having loaded any third-party apps. Things that seem like they'd be extraordinarily processor intensive (scrolling through a Timescape Spline, for instance) can be super fast, while a drop dead simple operation like opening a pop-up menu can momentarily bring the phone to a halt.

Anyway, back to the second part of Sony Ericsson's one-two punch: Mediascape. Anyone who's used any stock Android device -- 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, doesn't matter -- can tell you that the in-built music app is in desperate need of tender loving care, and these guys have given it just that. Basically, Mediascape is your one-stop shop for browsing music, videos, and photos on the device; there's also support for the company's PlayNow store, though we weren't able to test it (it still hasn't launched in the US, though it's available in a number of European markets). The app makes clever use of album art, presenting you with a list of recently-played and favorite tracks when you first start -- there's some Timescape integration as well, where you'll find the art in a Spline representing your chronological consumption of audio. Naturally, it's got support for a variety of browsing modes (album, artist, and so on), background playback, and everything else you'd expect from a basic music player. Well, almost everything -- as we'd mentioned in the hardware section of this review, we were a little underwhelmed with the X10's bass response over the headset, and we would've loved a graphic equalizer in here to help clear that up. No dice.

Keyboard input -- a pretty important topic, if you ask us -- was a surprisingly big problem on the X10. First off, you can't consistently use the back button to clear the keyboard like you can on virtually every other Android device we used -- here, it deletes everything in your current text field and keeps the keyboard up on the screen on occasion, thought we can't nail down the pattern of the behavior. Much, much more dangerous, though, is the fact that we're seeing all sorts of missed inputs. You'll press a letter (and you get the character pop-up, so you know the keyboard has registered it), and maybe somewhere between 2 and 3 percent of the time, it won't "take" -- it just won't go into your input box, which makes entering almost any text a maddening procedure. Virtual keyboards have enough difficulty as it is without something this egregious coming into play, and we're hoping it's a bug that Sony Ericsson can pin down and fix posthaste.


Saturday, August 20, 2011

Nokia Astound: Affordable Android Alternative

During the war of the latest smart phones, the one new warrior comes....
yeah.... Nokia Astound...
This is the Nokia's latest phone. It have a number of apps and it also based on android latest version. Here's some qualities of it.

Design

If the Astound looks familiar, it is because it is the T-Mobile branded version of the Nokia C7, an unlocked global Symbian phone. The two are very similar, but the Nokia Astound has a different color scheme with T-Mobile branding. It also has the most recent version of Symbian.

The Astound is quite attractive with a frost white and dark silver color scheme and slim profile at only 0.4-inches thick. It weighs a manageable 4.58 ounces and feels really comfortable in hand. On the face of the phone, you'll find the Send, End and Menu buttons, which are flush into the phone. In the top right corner, you'll see the 0.3-megapixel VGA front-facing camera for video chat and snapping self portraits. The left edge of the Astound is clean, but you'll find a camera shutter key, a lock/unlock switch (which I always appreciate), a dedicated voice recognition button and the volume rocker. The top of the phone houses the USB port, 3.5-mm headphone jack and the power button.

On the back, you'll find the 8-megapixel camera as well as the battery and microSD slots. I didn't like how buried the microSD card slot was on this phone; you have to remove the back as well as the battery to get to it. The SIM card slot is nicely labeled however.

The Astound has a bright 3.5-inch AMOLED display with a resolution of 360-by-540 pixels, which is a bit smaller than the 4-inch and larger displays we've seen on the most recent crop of high-end smartphones. But I found it sufficient for browsing the Web, running various apps and watching YouTube clips. Since it is AMOLED, the display holds up pretty well in bright sunlight too and viewing angles are pretty good as well.

Symbian S3: Stale, but Functional

While the Astound might be attractive on the outside, Symbian is still, well, Symbian. Although it is a powerful and full-featured platform, its whole aesthetic feels dated and static compared to Android 2.3, Apple's iOS, and even the latest version of RIM's BlackBerry OS. This is the most recent version of Symbian S3 so you get a portrait QWERTY keyboard and an improved browser.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I really dislike Symbian's typography. The boxy, small text just looks so late-1990s to me, and it isn't easy on the eyes. When Nokia announced the Symbian S3 revamp, I had hoped for cleaner, more modern-looking typography and aesthetically pleasing icons. But S3 looks more or less the same as the previous version with some tweaks and added features here and there.

As I mentioned, you now get a portrait and landscape QWERTY keyboard in S3. Both keyboards are a bit cramped, but you at least get the added benefit of Swype for the landscape keyboard. Unfortunately, the portrait keyboard does not have Swype support which I found sort of annoying since I use portrait mode for most of my typing.

You also get only three homescreens to work with. For some users, three may be enough to accommodate all the widgets they need, but I wanted more. The widgets are all of identical size, and they're rather large, so you don't have a lot of room to work with. If you want to add a shortcut to an app on your homescreen, you must open the "shortcuts" widget; you can add a total of four icons on there. The process is a lot more complicated than Android's system of adding a widget or shortcut simply by holding down the touchscreen.

Arranging widgets is a bit of a pain as well. You can't move a widget between homescreens; instead, you have to delete it from one homepage and then add it to another. Moving widgets around on the same homepage is a simple matter of holding and dragging it to the desired place.

S3 does introduce some improvements over older Symbian versions, such as multitouch in the browser and photo gallery (at last!), a navigation system that requires fewer taps, and a simpler multitasking system. Also, when you press the battery icon in the homescreen, a window pops up to display available Wi-Fi connections, USB connections, and a bigger clock that you can use to adjust the time or set an alarm.

Despite these tweaks, Symbian S3 feels outdated and overly complicated in comparison to the Android OS and iOS. Simple tasks--such as adding shortcuts to your homepage--are more difficult to perform than they should be.

E-mail, Browser and Multimedia

The Symbian S3 e-mail client is pretty basic and gets the job done, but if you're a Gmail user, you'll obviously prefer Android's client (or even iOS) to the Symbian e-mail system. Setting up your Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail accounts is as simple as plugging in a username and password.

The spruced up S3 browser gives you tabbed browsing (international readers take note: the Nokia C7 does not have this version of S3), which is always useful. But the S3 browser doesn't hold against competitor browsers, like the Android stock browser. Scrolling can be a bit of a pain (it is kind of choppy) and the browser renders images slowly. The bright spot is that you can download an alternative browser, like Opera 11, which performed much better on the Astound in my hands-on tests.

The music player has a nice Cover Flow-esque interface when you're sifting throw you music library, but once you're in the Now Playing mode, you get a static screen showing album covers, track information and player controls. Audio quality sounded pretty good, though it wasn't mind-blowing.

Videos looked great on the Astound's sharp AMOLED display. If you're used to a display over 4-inches, however, the Astound's 3.5-incher might seem a bit cramped. YouTube videos played back smoothly as did the high definition videos I loaded on the device.

Camera

An 8-megapixel camera with a dual LED flash seems promising, but I was disappointed to learn that the Astound has no auto-focus. This isn't a big deal if you're taking photos of landscapes or a group of people. If you're focusing on a single person or object, however, your photos don't turn out very sharp. Pictures taken outside looked pretty good, but I had a hard time steadying the camera when I was on-the-go so my photos turned out a bit blurry. This was an instance autofocus could have really helped with image quality.

The camcorder can capture 720p (HD) video and my test clips looked pretty decent. Image quality could be a bit fuzzy indoors and looked smoother in my videos captured outside.

Performance

Powered by a 680MHz ARM 11 processor, the Astound can't keep up with the 1GHz and dual-core beasts we've seen this year. But for basic tasks, like Web browsing and using various apps, the Astound handled everything I threw at it.

Unlike the recent crop of phones we've seen from T-Mobile, the Astound is not a 4G phone, meaning it does not support T-Mobile's faster HSPA+ network. The Astound loaded up Web pages quickly enough over T-Mobile 3G in San Francisco.

Call quality was excellent. Voices sounded crystal clear over T-Mobile's network. The network isn't always the strongest here in San Francisco so I appreciated the bonus feature of being able to make calls over Wi-Fi.

Lastly, battery life was excellent. I was able to keep the battery going with moderate to heavy usage for about two day before it died. At the time of this review, we haven't completed our formal battery tests, but I can say that in my hands-on use, the Astound was a trooper.

Conclusion

I've said it before, but I'll say it again: Nokia phones have excellent hardware, but the Symbian platform simply cannot keep up with the competition when it comes to aesthetics and user-friendliness. Nokia officials had no comment on its relationship with Microsoft, but they did hint that there will be more Symbian phones to come. I'm excited to see what is to come with the Microsoft thing; Windows Phone 7 is a highly capable platform, especially when paired with the right hardware.

The Nokia Astound is a great phone for users who want a full-featured smartphone, but don't want to break the bank. If you're not a Google or Android fan and find the BlackBerry too business-minded, the Astound is a good choice. The Symbian platform isn't the most user-friendly, however, and the 8-megapixel camera feels like a waste without autofocus.


Thursday, August 11, 2011

UC Browser 7.8 Now Available on Blackberry

After the presence on nearly every major platform, UC Browser now released the official version for Blackberry to take the last piece of the cake. Opera Mini has the reason to be afraid of this release, because the newly release marked that UC Browser has invaded all its battle fields.

                  You could download this version at wap.ucweb.com directly from your handset.

By a test on UC Browser for BB, I found that it succeed all the good features from the traditional UC Browser version, such as the fast speed, traffic saving, powerful downloading function, and all the user experience oriented features. Let’s take a deeper look at it.

Fast speed is always the label of UC Browser
I have tested the T1 & T3 for both Opera Mini & UC Browser on Yahoo & New York Times, UC Browser has an obvious advantage over Opera Mini from the following table, about 2 seconds lead is showed.


Save your 85% of the traffic charge by the cutting edge compression technology
From the following test chart you could find that UC Browser save more than 30% of the traffic than Opera Mini, which means you could save about 30% of your spend on the tariff to your operators.


Start Page Site Navigation, to access to your favorite site with one click, no need to input URL
Considering the small keyboard and inconvenience of the handset input, UC Browser has provided the site navigation, which put most popular site in the start page, in order to make users can save the input to get access to their favorite sites.


Powerful download manager supporting download large file & multiple task & pause/resume
A lot of users in the developing countries may find that it is really hard to download large file due to the limited of the operators. However, with UC Browser, I am happy to tell you that you need no longer about the large file, because UC Browser supports the multi-tread download to get over the limit from operators. Moreover, the pause/resume function can make you don’t lose the downloading when the network is not good.




A lot of User Experience Oriented Features
UC Browser for BB supports “remember current page” & “clear all browser history” operation, close tab with right bottom, open the “menu” operation while loading page, to make more smooth operation in low level handset.


 


Also, UC Browser for BB supports to change the theme to make your browser more personalized.


Or you can download by your OS. (Remember to select the right os version,you can get OS information through "Option" ->"about" on your phone)
If your phone is touch screen, use the OS4.7 Version.
http://doo.im/bb47
 If your phone OS version is higher than 4.5(including 4.5) and not touch screen , select OS4.5 Version
http://doo.im/bb45
 If your phone OS version is lower than 4.5 and not touch screen , select OS4.2 Version .
http://doo.im/bb42



Monday, August 1, 2011

Apple Safari 5.1


The previous version of Safari for Windows dramatically changed the nature of the browser from something of an unfinished curiosity to an alternative with seriously quick chops. It lacked many of the customization features that define most other browsers, but certain unique default features, such as the visually impressive, Cover Flow-inspired Top Sites and history viewing, made it worth checking out for more users besides just browser enthusiasts and jaded reviewers.


Though Safari 5 continues the push for speed, able to surpass (by some tests) bleeding-edge JavaScript engines from Google and Opera, Apple continues to place feature development farther down the totem pole of importance. That doesn't mean that new features have been ignored. There's the new Reader option that streamlines how you read articles, broader support for HTML5, default support for searches on Bing, and performance improvements. However, the biggest new feature of them all--Extensions--won't be available until later this summer according to Apple, and depending on what you're looking for in a browser, Safari can be seen as lacking many helpful options.


Installation and setup
Safari 5 is easy to install, although the time it takes to run the installer feels longer than its major alterna-browser competitors of Firefox, Chrome, and Opera. It updates using the Apple Software Updater, which may opt you in to other Windows-based Apple programs when it detects an update. Safari does not come with an uninstaller, and so it must be removed using the default Windows Add/Remove Programs tool or a third-party remover.


Interface
Safari's interface hasn't changed much from Safari 4. Navigation remains on top in this version, with Back and Forward buttons, the location bar, the search box, current page menu, and preferences menu. Whereas both Safari and Chrome are based on WebKit, Safari has opted to keep its tabs below the navigation bar and retain its brushed gray interface. It will look the same on Windows XP or Windows 7, since there's no real support for Aero Glass. In many ways, it's not as minimal as Chrome or Opera, and feels a bit older because of it.

The bookmarks bar appears by default just below the navigation bar, and on all but significantly older computers users should see links to show all bookmarks and show Top Sites on the left.
The status bar remains hidden by default, which would be acceptable if there was another way to view a link's URL before clicking on it. Chrome manages a small pop-up at the bottom of the browser, but since Safari doesn't, we recommend forcing the status bar to appear for safety reasons. It's never a good idea to click blindly on a link, and it's unfortunate that the default Safari encourages this behavior. The status bar can be forced to appear from the View option on the menu bar, which is also hidden by default. You can force show the menu bar at the top of the Preferences menu, or by hitting the Alt key.


Features and support
Safari 5 comes with a new way to look at paginated stories and galleries, some helpful lesser feature improvements, and the promise of Extensions. As noted earlier, though, Apple has decided to not include many options that Firefox, Opera, Internet Explorer, and even Safari's cousin Chrome have.


Performance
Safari's performance has definitely been improved, and it remains the browser's strongest selling point, in part because of the hardware acceleration (only in the Windows version, read more about hardware acceleration here) and DNS prefetching. Part of that is because of the improvements made to the Nitro JavaScript engine. 
On a Windows 7 x86, running on an Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 at 2.53GHz, with 3GB of RAM, Safari notched an average of 465.5 milliseconds over three cold-boot runs on the SunSpider JavaScript test. The current stable version of Chrome released today, version 5.0.375.70, scored 525.19 ms. The disparity between the Mac versions was far greater. On a Mac OS X 10.6.3, running on the same Intel chip as the Windows 7 computer but with 4GB of RAM, Safari 5 completed the SunSpider tests in 351.7 ms. Google Chrome took 498.67 ms. Though the developer's version of Chrome comes in at 356.9 ms on the Windows 7 computer, indicating that Safari's benchmarks can be not only achieved but surpassed, Safari's the only stable public version with these numbers.


Conclusion
Speed is important, but it's not the only judge of a good browser. With the exception of the unique Reader feature, Safari 5 does more to bring Apple's browser into line with other browsers than actually trailblazing, and even with the improvements made to this version, Safari still lacks many of the small but useful features competitors offer. For raw JavaScript speed, Safari is at the head of the pack for now, but Apple's focus on other user needs remains less than exemplary.

Followers

Blogger Widgets